Smatterings
The Boston Globe meets William Landay, who relates why he left prosecution behind for full time writing of such wonderful books as THE STRANGLER.
Steve Allan has a couple of excellent interviews up with Jenny Siler and Keith Dixon.
At Things I'd Rather Be Doing, Charles Ardai is this week's interview guest.
Every day brings a new awards shortlist, and today's is the Gumshoe Awards, courtesy Mystery Ink. The nominees are a diverse and eclectic bunch, to be sure.
Patrick Anderson had never reviewed Laura Lippman's work before, but something tells me he has some major catching up to do after his thoughts on WHAT THE DEAD KNOW.
Peter Osnos has some great thoughts on the future of book reviews in newspapers, and Warren Buffett has brilliant insights into the future of newspapers.
The Brown Daily Herald has a great writeup of the university's recent "Pulp Uncovered" Festival (link via.)
USA Today talks to Harry Bernstein, the 96 year old author of a memoir of his past and the divide between Christians and Jews.
UK SF Book News has a lengthy interview with Richard Morgan on the eve of publication of his newest novel, BLACK MAN.
The Bat Segundo show went a bit crazy with content over the weekend, supplying interviews of Martin Amis, Jane Ganahl, Ron Jeremy and Annalee Newitz & Charlie Anders.
The Independent picks up on Muriel Gray's comments after the Orange Broadband Prize was longlisted.
And finally, Dana Kaye has some great points about the complexities of reviewing. Which is also why I hope she reviews more widely.
A big WOW for Patrick Anderson's review of Laura Lippman's brilliant new novel. That review absolutely blew me away. He praises the book so much that it would almost seem extreme, if it weren't all so well-deserved.
Anderson drives me up the wall sometimes, but when he's on his game, he can really do some damn fine work.
Posted by:David J. Montgomery | March 20, 2007 at 10:38 AM
Why do you continue to offer credence to that despicable Ed Champion fellow? Yes, I realize he pays my bills. And I thank you for pointing out my podcasts, even though I am generally quite inebriated when I record these foolish intros. It has been proven without a shadow of a doubt that Champion is a fundamentally worthless writer. As Mary Dell has indicated, he is incapable of irony. As King Wenclas and May Barber had proven, he cannot write to an audience.
I don't know why you're so obsessed with Ed Champion's efforts, although I'm pleased to see that the blogosphere is now ignoring him. Because it's about time that this douchebag be revealed for the charlatan he is.
Posted by:Bat Segundo | March 20, 2007 at 02:31 PM
Patrick Anderson's review of Laura's book dovetails beautifully into the discussion of respect for wonderful work.
Posted by:David Thayer | March 20, 2007 at 08:10 PM