Follow Me

Picks of the Week

  • Harry Dolan: Bad Things Happen

    Harry Dolan: Bad Things Happen
    BAD THINGS HAPPEN is a nifty debut, cleverly told and unfurled from the very first line: "The shovel has to meet certain requirements" on through meeting "the man who calls himself David Loogan." There are reasons for concealment, just as there are reasons the editor of a mystery magazine bearing little resemblance to EQMM or AHMM might bring him into the fold, thus catalyzing a series of murderous events. The twists come quickly and the dialogue is sharp and if it falls apart slightly at the end, no matter - I want to read much more from Dolan from now on.

  • Ian MacKenzie: City of Strangers: A Novel

    Ian MacKenzie: City of Strangers: A Novel
    MacKenzie's debut novel reminded me a lot of Paul Auster's NEW YORK TRILOGY, whether it was intended or not, in terms of his choice of words, the thrust of the narrative and the existential nature of the main character (whose first name, incidentally, is Paul) caught up in a snowballing sequence of strange and violent events in and around New York City. MacKenzie straddles the line between thriller and internal examination of a man's failings, and his ability to do so establishes him as a young writer of serious talent and future.

  • Megan Abbott: Bury Me Deep

    Megan Abbott: Bury Me Deep
    In a word: amazing. In more words: Megan Abbott, who has never delivered anything less than an excellent novel, exceeds expectations and takes a very bold and very necessary step forward both in the quality of the prose, the development of her characters and especially in portraying how obsession seeps into the very soul of people, transforming them into their worst nightmares all too easily. Just read this book. And then tell many others to do so as well.

  • Ninni Holmqvist: The Unit

    Ninni Holmqvist: The Unit
    Understandably, echoes of THE HANDMAID'S TALE are hard to ignore in this dystopic examination of a society where fertility is so high a priority that older, single, marginal women are shut away in secret locales to live out the rest of their lives in seemingly perfect harmony - at least, until the "donations" begin. But Holmqvist's marvelous book doesn't browbeat her thesis into the reader and smartly expands her ideas to look at the plight of all marginalized folk, women and men alike, and how the promise of comforts can be the most horrifying of all. Prepare to be disturbed, but prepare further to think about the ramifications.

  • Paula Froelich: Mercury in Retrograde

    Paula Froelich: Mercury in Retrograde
    This is possibly the most perfect novel for today's economically challenged times. Why? Because it has plenty of glitz and glamor and blind items, as befitting a narrative by the deputy editor of Page Six, but Froelich isn't arch or snarky or acid-tongued in the slightest. Her trio of protagonists land in all manner of embarrassing situations but they aren't played for mean-spirited laughs. The New York here is something of a fantasy-land, but not so far off the mark that it's completely unbelievable. Most of all it's clear Froelich remains sincere and optimistic about her chosen city, and has retained her sense of fun. So no need to check your brain at the door, but sometimes it just needs to chill out and relax.

Archived Picks

...And Cabana Girls, Too

Stats


« Smatterings | Main | The Author is Faulks, Sebastian Faulks »

July 10, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451af9169e200e008d5ac6e8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lehane Gives Thumbs-Up to GONE, BABY GONE Movie:

Comments

Everything about the movie looks great...except Casey Affleck. Casting him as Kenzie is up there with Shawn Ryan casting his wife on "The Shield" as nepotism that could taint an otherwise stellar production. Ed Harris gave me chills, and Morgan Freeman is never bad in anything. "Gone, Baby, Gone" is my favorite Kenzie/Gennaro book, hope Gigli knows what he's doing.

I'm with Jason. Casey just feels off. I think Ben would have made a better Patrick then his brother, but I'm an unabashed Ben fan.

As someone who thought Kenzie always got in over his head, I approve of Casey Affleck as Pat.

Casey Affleck was not how I pictured Kenzie when I read the books, but I have to say, in the trailer he's got the Dorchester persona nailed dead on...

Casey Affleck was not how I pictured Kenzie when I read the books, but I have to say, in the trailer he's got the Dorchester persona nailed dead on...

I'm willing to give Casey Affleck a chance. He looks much leaner and grownup now, almost like a different actor. He may give the film a certain level of freshness or perhaps severely weaken it. Let's see if he can stand his own opposite Ed Harris.

I'm going to come to Casey Affleck's defense. He is a really terrific actor (anyone remember his portrayal of a cannabis-retarded lawn service guy in DROWNING MONA?) who hasn't had a chance to prove it. I'm betting he steps up here.

I think Casey Affleck can be a good actor, but he just looks too young for the part. I can't wait to see the movie even if he is miscast.

Maybe it's a matter of perspective. The Patrick Kenzie of "Gone, Baby, Gone" (I mean the novel, hence the use of commas) has gone through all the tribulations of the first three novels, and so readers and fans of Lehane's books might have trouble fitting someone who looks like Casey Affleck into that image. On the other hand, the Patrick Kenzie of "Gone Baby Gone" (the movie) is in the same place (as far as viewers are concerned) as the Patrick Kenzie of "A Drink Before the War." In that book, we were just getting to know the character, and (as Mr. So ably points out) he was someone who often found himself in over his head.

Personally, one of the things I've appreciated about the character Lehane created is that he isn't a superman -- he's often as frightened by the things he faces as the reader is (and Lehane is very good at putting his characters into hair-raising, nail-biting, oh-god-please-take-me-to-anyplace-but-this-place scenarios).

In other words, I was pretty impressed by the trailer, and am looking forward to see how the movie plays out.

A writer giving the thumbs up to a film adaptation of one of his books, however great or mediocre it may turn out to be? You don't say!

Well, it doesn't always happen. I vaguely recall (paraphrasing) Michael Connelly referring to BLOOD WORK as his Clint Eastwood B-side. And Alan Moore's famous for slagging off (certainly for LXG, with considerable justification) adaptations of his work. There must've been others, too.

All that aside, I like the trailer. Looks very promising to me, although very light on the Gennaro side.

What's most surprising about this article to me, is the hint that Lehane is going back to the pair in his novels.

(It's actually more than a hint, isn't it?)

As usual, Dave White gets it exactly right. I hope the movie hits big, so that Lehane will have an incentive to write another Kenzie/Gennaro book.

Great news. I'd love to see another Kenzie/Gennaro book from Lehane, if he's feelin' it again.

As for the casting - The trailer looks great, despite the lack of Gennaro that John pointed out. Brother Affleck can clearly act. He may or may not be stellar in the role but his acting looks at least credible, as much as you can tell from a trailer.

True, Affleck doesn't look like the Patrick Kenzie in my head. The guy in my head looks a little more physically substantial, a little less delicate... but doesn't look like Jack Reacher, either. A regular guy, reasonably fit.

But we could name dozens of slight actors who play convincing scrappy tough guys. So I'll give the kid a fair shake. I suspect he's gonna pull it off just fine. And I believe Lehane when he says that he'd have disappeared if he thought the movie sucked.

My problem with Casey Affleck based on that trailer is how thin his voice is. I suspect this means he was never trained as an actor, as he can't project worth a damn. The wimpiness of his delivery gives his character the appearance he lacks conviction or power. (Or I suppose it could mean they just had a lousy sound guy, but I doubt it.)

I'm very impressed with the trailer. I didn't know what to expect, but it looks like they might pull it off. As far as Casey Affleck goes, I buy it. I didn't when I first read he'd been cast, but I think I'll have to eat my words if the trailer is any indication.

Also, there's something to say for homegrown boys doing Boston films. There's nothing worse than a fake Boston accent (see: Jeff Bridges in Blown Away). So I'm glad we have a hometown boy doing Patrick.

Casey Affleck does look young, but here's something I have noticed as I get older: all the cops look young.

My big problem with the trailer is that it looks like Patrick is the hero and Angie is the girlfriend.

Angie's role as Patrick's detecting partner should not be diminished. I hope it only seems that way in the trailer, and not in the actual film.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment